M.L. King Jr. Academy
400 Clinton River Dr
Mount Clemens MI, 48043, Macomb County
Phone: 586-461-3100
Ranking: (2,016 out of 2,213, bottom 9%)*
Type: Regular School
Status: Closed
Grade: Kindergarten to Grade 2
School District: Mount Clemens Community School District
Title I Eligible School: NA
Magnet: NA
Charter: NA
Shared-Time School: NA
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | NA | NA | 2 | NA | NA | 15 | 15 | 17 | 22 | |||||
Total Students: | NA | NA | 55 | NA | NA | 269 | 307 | 253 | 311 | |||||
Kindergarten: | NA | NA | 51 | 92.7% | NA | NA | 38 | 14.1% | 54 | 17.6% | 48 | 19.0% | 50 | 16.1% |
Grade 1: | NA | NA | 4 | 7.3% | NA | NA | 44 | 16.4% | 48 | 15.6% | 42 | 16.6% | 65 | 20.9% |
Grade 2: | NA | NA | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | 43 | 16.0% | 44 | 14.3% | 46 | 18.2% | 60 | 19.3% |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | NA | NA | 32 | 58.2% | NA | NA | 127 | 47.2% | 132 | 43.0% | 103 | 40.7% | 141 | 45.3% |
Female: | NA | NA | 23 | 41.8% | NA | NA | 142 | 52.8% | 137 | 44.6% | 120 | 47.4% | 126 | 40.5% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | NA | NA | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.3% | 1 | 0.4% | 3 | 1.0% |
Asian: | NA | NA | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 0.3% |
Hispanic: | NA | NA | 1 | 1.8% | NA | NA | 9 | 3.3% | 6 | 2.0% | 5 | 2.0% | 5 | 1.6% |
Black: | NA | NA | 36 | 65.5% | NA | NA | 212 | 78.8% | 241 | 78.5% | 192 | 75.9% | 204 | 65.6% |
White: | NA | NA | 11 | 20.0% | NA | NA | 22 | 8.2% | 29 | 9.4% | 33 | 13.0% | 58 | 18.6% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | NA | NA | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | 0 | 0.0% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | NA | NA | 7 | 12.7% | NA | NA | 26 | 9.7% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | NA | NA | 49 | 89.1% | NA | NA | 216 | 80.3% | 286 | 93.2% | 221 | 87.4% | 224 | 72.0% |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | NA | NA | 3 | 5.5% | NA | NA | 5 | 1.9% | 8 | 2.6% | 16 | 6.3% | 18 | 5.8% |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | NA | NA | 27.50 | NA | NA | 18.55 | 20.47 | 15.20 | 14.20 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
MEAP | ||||||
2006 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 88.9% | 83.9% | 87% |
2007 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 85% | 93.5% | 87.9% |
2008 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 84.3% | 87.9% | 90.2% |
2009 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 86.8% | 90.6% | 91.3% |
2010 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 90% | 89.4% | 94.8% |
2011 | Math | 3rd Grade | % met std | 82.9% | 90.4% | 95.3% |
2006 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 75% | 78.9% | 86.6% |
2007 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 95% | 87.6% | 87.4% |
2008 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 78% | 78.5% | 86.4% |
2009 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 63.2% | 79.2% | 86.4% |
2010 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 80.5% | 77.8% | 89.8% |
2011 | Reading | 3rd Grade | % met std | 60% | 68.5% | 86.8% |
2006 | Writing | 3rd Grade | % met std | 60.7% | 44.6% | 51.5% |
2007 | Writing | 3rd Grade | % met std | 35% | 40.5% | 51.8% |
2008 | Writing | 3rd Grade | % met std | 54% | 46.5% | 57.4% |
2009 | Writing | 3rd Grade | % met std | 30.8% | 45.6% | 61.1% |
2006 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 85.2% | 70.6% | 81.6% |
2007 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 52% | 75.4% | 84.6% |
2008 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 91.7% | 83.4% | 85.8% |
2009 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 65.9% | 73.1% | 87.9% |
2010 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 85.3% | 86.5% | 92.3% |
2011 | Math | 4th Grade | % met std | 70.6% | 78.5% | 91.5% |
2006 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 76.9% | 74.4% | 83.2% |
2007 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 58.3% | 78.2% | 84.9% |
2008 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 81.1% | 79.9% | 84.5% |
2009 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 57.8% | 67.1% | 82.8% |
2010 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 55.9% | 66.2% | 84.1% |
2011 | Reading | 4th Grade | % met std | 61.8% | 70.2% | 84.1% |
2006 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 53.8% | 53.4% | 54.8% |
2007 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 8.3% | 33.5% | 45.2% |
2008 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 51.4% | 47.9% | 44.5% |
2009 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 13.3% | 21.3% | 44.4% |
2011 | Writing | 4th Grade | % met std | 17.6% | 28.1% | 47.2% |
2006 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 33.3% | 53.8% | 73.4% |
2007 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 66.7% | 62.9% | 75.9% |
2008 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 48.8% | 64.5% | 74.2% |
2009 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 41.7% | 62% | 76.8% |
2010 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 51.4% | 73.1% | 79.5% |
2011 | Math | 5th Grade | % met std | 57.6% | 70.9% | 79.9% |
2006 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 50% | 66.3% | 80% |
2007 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 76.2% | 78.8% | 84.1% |
2008 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 62.5% | 72.8% | 81.6% |
2009 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 52.8% | 72.3% | 81.5% |
2010 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 69.4% | 74.6% | 85.2% |
2011 | Reading | 5th Grade | % met std | 66.7% | 76.4% | 85.1% |
2006 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 35.3% | 58.7% | 76.8% |
2007 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 71.4% | 72.7% | 82.8% |
2008 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 53.7% | 67.1% | 81.7% |
2009 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 52.9% | 71.4% | 83.1% |
2010 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 60% | 72.9% | 81% |
2011 | Science | 5th Grade | % met std | 54.5% | 69.3% | 78.1% |
2006 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 38.2% | 52.4% | 62.9% |
2007 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 57.1% | 57.6% | 57.4% |
2008 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 27.5% | 42.4% | 58.8% |
2009 | Writing | 5th Grade | % met std | 35.3% | 55.4% | 63.4% |
2006 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 72.4% | 64.5% | 65.1% |
2007 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 43.5% | 39.4% | 69% |
2010 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 63.6% | 72.7% | 82% |
2011 | Math | 6th Grade | % met std | 70.3% | 77.8% | 84.5% |
2006 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 80% | 83.8% | 79.6% |
2007 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 50% | 63% | 83.3% |
2010 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 72.7% | 81.7% | 87.7% |
2011 | Reading | 6th Grade | % met std | 63.2% | 72.6% | 84% |
2010 | Social Studies | 6th Grade | % met std | 54.5% | 55.4% | 73.4% |
2011 | Social Studies | 6th Grade | % met std | 42.1% | 61% | 75.3% |
2006 | Writing | 6th Grade | % met std | 75.9% | 80.1% | 74.8% |
2007 | Writing | 6th Grade | % met std | 69.6% | 58.2% | 74.1% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* M.L. King Jr. Academy was rated 1 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.